Agility scores double win at Payload Asia awards 2014

Singapore ,Oct. 30, 2014(STAT):-Agility, a leading global logistics provider, has received the Global Logistics Provider of the Year award and Corporate Social Responsibility award at the Payload Asia Awards 2014. Agility was recognized for its innovative integrated logistics solutions that are backed by its strong operational performance and commitment to its customers and communities through […]

Singapore ,Oct. 30, 2014(STAT):-Agility, a leading global logistics provider, has received the Global Logistics Provider of the Year award and Corporate Social Responsibility award at the Payload Asia Awards 2014.

Agility was recognized for its innovative integrated logistics solutions that are backed by its strong operational performance and commitment to its customers and communities through personal service and corporate social responsibility initiatives.

The Payload Asia Awards is an annual event that recognizes organisations that have made a difference in the air cargo supply chain. This year’s event was held on 29 October in Singapore and attended by more than 300 global logistics industry leaders.

“I am proud to receive this double accolade because the awards demonstrate that we are meeting the needs of our customers in Asia and delivering on our promises, said Chris Price, CEO Asia Pacific. “I’d like to recognize the importance and dedication of Agility’s employees across the region, who are responsible for our daily activities. It also means our CSR initiatives are making a positive impact to the communities where we operate. What makes the win even more credible is the fact that the Global Logistics Provider of the Year award was judged by an expert panel from the industry.”

The winners in the Customer Choice Awards were selected by an online transparent and independently audited voting process that represents the views and decisions of customers, business partners and Payload Asia readers. The winners in the Industry Choice Awards were analyzed and ranked by an international panel of industry experts, who were not allowed to judge categories in which they have a direct conflict of interest.

Read Full Article
Next Story
Share it